Does anyone have any research that has been carried out that specifically relates to management activities landowners do to protect private land bush areas (which are often surrounded by pasture)? The management activities are mainly 1) animal pest control, 2) invasive weed control and 3)fencing to exclude stock or large mammalian pests. I am looking for information that would tell me which of these activities would be the most important - the jury is out about which would rank the highest. The people I have spoken to argue either for fencing being the most important because no amount of animal or weed control will be effective if the bush area is constantly invaded by stock, plus it is really the first step in managing a bush block. Others argue that animal pest control is the most important because it has the greatest potential to ensure the bush area survives (animal pests can end up causing collapse of the bush area because they eat the seeds, seedlings and native birds which distribute the seeds). Any thoughts or known research that would tell us which is the most important? Thanks in advance
Chrissy Henley
Senior Biodiversity Advisor
Auckland Council
New Zealand
Management of Bush areas - which is the most important - Weed Control, Animal Pest Control, or Fencing to exclude stock?
Sign in or Sign up to comment

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your comments. It is a tricky one for us as the bush areas we are looking at are spread across the whole of the Auckland region which is varied so the issues are potentially different - Surrounding landuse and the management of surrounding areas plays a big part. This is why I was hoping that there might be some research that might help out but I know that this is potentially a big ask.
Chrissy Henley
Senior Biodiversity Advisor
Auckland Council
New Zealand
Dear Chrissy, Do you think that your question might need to be focussed on a given geographic space? For example if you asked this question for a patch of remnant bushland in one area of Australia, for example in outback Queensland Australia, then the answer might be narrowed down to feral 'cats' are the number one concern. But if the remnant was somewhere in Tasmania in a highland area it might be a completely different kettle of fish... or cats ... or invasive plant. Then there's the other layers of question to be addressed such as - should one be looking to prevent, eradicate, or contain the threat(s) or protect the asset (in this case a remnant of bushland). Your literature search should be based upon the identified threats for a given geographic space I reckon.
Thomas Williams
NSW NPWS
Oz
Don-Thomas Williams
Project Officer
NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service
Australia