Lauren Minuk Calgary Mar 20, 2014 19:16 pm

Hi all,

I've been having some discussions with a coworker about whether or not to include "climate change" language as a selling feature or a measurable when it comes to waste assessments. The two arguments are as follows:

a) waste can be tracked with respect to GHGs and this is a common form of measurement. Also, waste reductions can be sold as GHG credits to organizations that emit more GHGs than they're allowed according to Alberta's Climate Change Emissions Management Act.
b) waste could be treated as its own issue for two main reasons: i) some people aren't convinced by "climate change" and whether they're a climate change denier or it just isn't really something that's on their radar there's no sense in fighting over it with them and ii) waste is already an accessible subject and people can relate to it for a variety of reasons (e.g. land stewardship, the craziness of disposable products, cost of disposal, etc.)

I'm wondering if anyone has any experience or is aware of any scholarly research that looks at how effective the term "climate change" is in terms of winning people over.

I hope I haven't been too obvious with the side that I sit on! Also, for context we're in Calgary, AB.

Thanks so much!

Lauren Minuk
Green Workplace Consultant
Green Calgary
Canada